摘要:1998年7月7日，罗马外交官大会上以压倒性的票数通过了具有划时代意义的《国际刑事法院罗马规约》，2002年7月1日，规约正式生效，国际刑事法院正式建立。自《罗马规约》生效之日起，国际刑事法院管辖权与国家主权一直是国际社会争论的焦点。本文将从国际刑事法院管辖权的确立过程、分析国际刑事法院管辖权与国家主权的协调与冲突的关系，最后论述我国的立场与应对策略。我国应正确认识《罗马规约》的内容，深入研究国际刑事法院管辖权和密切关注国际刑事法院的运作与发展，考虑选择适当时机加入《罗马规约》，在实践中采取灵活可行的方式维护国家的主权和利益。

关键词：国际刑事法院；管辖权；国家主权；《罗马规约》

Abstract:On July 17th，1998，at the United Nations Diplomatic Conference of Plenipotentiaries on the Establishment of an International Criminal Court held in Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court of historic significance was voted through with an overwhelming majority. With the Rome Statute coming into force on July 1st，2002, the International Criminal Court was formally established. Since the day “Rome Statute” was founded ,the issue of the jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court has become the focus of controversy. This article is divided into four parts ,including the process of the International Criminal Court jurisdiction being set up, the coordination and conflict between the jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court and the national sovereignty, and discusses China’s position and strategy finally . Our country would choose an appropriate time to join the “Rome Statute” after better understanding the content , studying the jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court and the operation and development of the International Criminal Court . We are tend to use a flexible way to protect our national sovereignty and our interest.

Key word: International Criminal Court；Jurisdiction；National Sovereignty ；Rome Statute

　　　自从国际刑事法院诞生之日起，关于国际刑事法院的管辖权的争议就没有停止过。由于国际刑事法院的基本文件《罗马规约》中所确立的管辖权不再是间接管辖权方式，而是直接管辖方式，具有强制性和补充性，这种管辖权对国家主权构成了挑战。国际刑事法院基于《罗马规约》对某些国际核心罪行具有直接强制管辖权，被大多数学者认为是对一国司法主权，特别是对国内法院审判权的侵犯，因此对国际刑事法院管辖权与国家主权的关系的研究具有十分重要的意义；国际刑事法院在国际社会上发挥的作用会越来越大，我国应该深入研究国际刑事法院管辖权和密切关注国际刑事法院的运作与发展，并考虑选择适当时机加入《罗马规约》，在实践中采取灵活可行的方式维护国家的主权和利益。